Debate at the English lesson

which confirm that computer games are useful.
The 1st argument is: Computer games influence favorably common development of children and help them to grow as personality.
Computer is a friend to play with. Computer games develop the quickness of thinking, mind and logic. During the computer games the players solve global problems in definite time. Thereby they develop the above-mentioned qualities.
In the "shoot" games the players must jump, run, shot at the necessary moment, thanks to it they develop their reaction.
There are many games, in which a player can be a historical personality, for example, Napoleon, Zhanna Dark, King Arthur and so on. They can fight against Nazis or in other wars. But to know the aims and the tasks of the game, the players must know the history and before the game they have to get acquainted with the history, when and where this battle or war was, who the leader in this battle was, thereby they expand their horizon. The players learn to reach their aim without conflicts, because for the victory they have to pass the game with the least losses, choose the best decision among many, thanks to it the players solve problems without difficulties. Id like to adduce you the fact from the journal "Smena"? At the conference which was held by the psychologist I. P. Burlakov among the teachers there were both just graduated and the doctor of science, and everybody said: The children, who have computers at home, differ from others. They are broad-minded, more sociable and less conflict able They reach their aim and solve the problems without any difficulties". Thats why we assert that computer games influence favorably on common development of children and help them to grow as personality.
Our 2nd argume