Debate at the English lesson

also causes the pollution of environment, and the polluted environment doesnt favour the development of the country, thats why we dont agree with the argument of our opponents.
Our 2nd argument is: The production of oil and gas causes more harm than benefit. In support of this argument and against the facts of our opponents I want to adduce you the information from the newspaper. "Altyn Orda" January, 11, 2002. The village Sarykamys didnt have many problems until Tengizchevroil began the production of oil. And when they realized that the government of Kazakhstan didnt pay much attention to their work they began to extract more oil than it was planned. Then following the principle the less workers the more profits they cut down the staff. And the sr argument of our opponents is: The production of oil and gas gives job for thousands people. But here is the fact against their argument. In 2011 Kazakh oil produced 2 mln tons of oil and 10 people worked there, the current year it produces 10 mln tons and the number of oil workers was cut by half.
As for the number of unemployed people, Mangistau oblast is on the ual place in the republic. After that how can they say, that the oil production gives job to people? I cant agree with it. The production of oil and gas is also dangerous for the health and life of the people In addition to the above the newspaper экономика Казахстана writes: In regions where oil is produced, people have problems with blood more often than in other regions.
According to the akims order e 1893 the population of the above mentioned Sarykamys was examined. None of 3210 people was healthy there. The death -rate there is twice as large as in the oblast The reason of this fact is the air and water pollution, because of toxic waste